The Best Edit May Be a Query

screenwriter reading script

Not every sentence problem should be solved with a rewrite. Sometimes the strongest edit is a question.

This is especially true in medical and scientific editing, where precision matters and the editor may not be the content owner. A sentence may be awkward because the logic is incomplete. A claim may sound overstated because the evidence is being interpreted too broadly. A term may appear inconsistent because the author is distinguishing between concepts that are not yet clear to the reader. In those cases, silently rewriting the text can create risk. The editor may smooth the prose but unintentionally change the meaning. I see this frequently, to the point where the heavily edited content no longer aligns with the sources cited.

Read more

The Narrative Thread

a person weaving cotton thread

This post originally appeared on Strategic Grantsmanship and is republished here with permission.

Narrative coherence in grant proposals is not about style—it is about strategy.

When writers talk about “narrative” in grants, it is often misunderstood as storytelling in the literary sense. Reviewers are not looking for drama, flourish, or creative voice. What we are tracking—often subconsciously—is whether the proposal maintains a coherent narrative thread from beginning to end.

This narrative thread is not ornamental. It is the mechanism that allows reviewers to follow logic, evaluate significance, and maintain confidence in the investigator and the proposed work.

Read more