The Importance of Understanding Statistics for Medical Editors

In the realm of medical writing and publishing, the role of a medical editor is pivotal. We are the gatekeepers of quality, ensuring that the information disseminated to healthcare professionals, researchers, and the public is accurate and understandable. One crucial aspect of this role is understanding statistics.

For those editors with proficiency in statistics, maintaining and honing the expertise can be a fabulous way to set yourself apart from the crowd. In the era of AI, upskilling–that is, elevating and refining your current skill set–will be the key to professional survival for many editors, and the ability to enhance and improve your projects by casting a critical eye on statistics and research design is one way to set yourself apart from the crowd (and AI).

For every medical editor (and writer!), this knowledge is not merely beneficial but essential for several reasons.

Enhancing the Quality of Publications

Statistics is the backbone of medical research. It allows researchers to analyze data, draw conclusions, and determine the significance of their findings. A medical editor with a firm grasp of statistics can critically evaluate the statistical methods used in a study. They can identify potential errors, biases, or misinterpretations, ensuring that only robust and credible research gets published. This vigilance helps maintain the integrity of scientific literature.

Improving Communication and Clarity

Medical editors serve as intermediaries between researchers and the readers. They must translate complex statistical data into clear, concise, and accessible language. Understanding statistics enables editors to accurately interpret the results and significance of studies, avoiding the risk of miscommunication. Understanding the conventions (ie, style) for accurately communicating statistics improves clarity by meeting the readers’ expectations. This clarity is crucial, especially when the findings have direct implications for clinical practice or public health.

Ensuring Ethical Standards

Ethical considerations are paramount in medical research and publishing. Misuse or misrepresentation of statistical data can lead to false claims, misinforming readers and potentially causing harm. (As the economist Ronald Coase quipped, “If you torture the data long enough, nature will confess.”) Editors equipped with statistical knowledge can detect such issues, preventing the publication of misleading information. This vigilance upholds ethical standards and protects the credibility of the medical journal.


Want to keep in touch and receive our news and content? Subscribe to the Evergreen Newsletter to receive the latest!


Basic Statistical Concepts for Medical Editors

To fulfill these responsibilities effectively, medical editors should be familiar with several key statistical concepts:

  1. Descriptive Statistics: Understanding measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and variability (range, standard deviation) is fundamental. These metrics provide a summary of the data, offering insights into its distribution and spread.
  2. Inferential Statistics: This involves making predictions or inferences about a population based on a sample. Key concepts include p-values, confidence intervals, and hypothesis testing. Editors should understand how these are used to determine the significance and reliability of study results.
  3. Regression Analysis: This statistical method assesses the relationship between variables. Knowledge of linear and logistic regression helps editors evaluate studies exploring correlations and causative factors.
  4. Survival Analysis: Often used in clinical trials, this involves analyzing the time until an event occurs (eg, death, relapse). Understanding Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models is essential for interpreting these studies.
  5. Randomization and Blinding: These are critical components of clinical trials that minimize bias. Editors should understand these concepts to assess the validity of trial results.
  6. Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews: These synthesize data from multiple studies to provide comprehensive insights. Editors need to understand how these analyses are conducted and interpreted to evaluate their findings critically.

Want to Improve Your Game?

If you have your statistics down, focus on improving your editorial skills. The presentation of statistical material is fairly regimented across audiences, especially technical readers. See Resources (below) for books every editor working with statistics should read and keep on their desk.

If you don’t have a command of the basic statistical concepts listed above, consider taking an online course or reading up. If you are a visual or aural learner, an online course may work well for you, and many online options are free (eg, Coursera, but there are many more). If you learn best by reading, the internet has a lot to offer, just use your judgment. There are many introductory statistics books as well (see Resources, below).

The best learning option is the one you will actually use.

Conclusion

For medical editors, a solid understanding of statistics is not just an asset but a necessity. It enhances the quality of publications, improves communication, and ensures ethical standards are met. By mastering basic statistical concepts, medical editors can perform their roles more effectively, contributing to the advancement of medical knowledge and the improvement of health outcomes.

Resources

Books

Huff D, Gies I. How to Lie with Statistics. W. W. Norton & Company;1982.

Lang TA, Secic M. How to Report Statistics in Medicine. 2nd ed. American College of Physicians;2006.

Livingston, EH. Study Design and Statistics. In: AMA Manual of Style Committee. AMA Manual of Style. 11th ed. Oxford University Press;2020:977-1095.

Zar, JH. Biostatistical Analysis. 5th ed. Pearson;2009.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Evergreen Biomedical Communications Group, LLC

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading